Official portrait of Al Green, U.S. Representative for Texas

U.S. Representative

Al Green

Texas District 9

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

189

across 12 categories

203 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-7508Official Website2347 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4309

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

203 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 agriculture#4 other#5 banking finance

203

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.45Progressive

Representative Al Green positions himself on the progressive end of the Democratic Party, with a voting record that is more liberal than the average House Democrat. His NOMINATE score of -0.447 reflects consistent alignment with progressive policy positions across most legislative areas.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

203

total votes analyzed

Overview

Al Green has served in the U.S. House representing Texas, establishing a voting record that reflects progressive Democratic priorities. His legislative activity spans multiple policy areas, with particularly high engagement on healthcare issues, where he has cast 110 recorded votes. His voting patterns show strong support for defense-related measures (83% yea) and agricultural legislation (62% yea), while demonstrating more selective support in healthcare (47% yea) and banking/finance (50% yea). This suggests he takes nuanced positions within his progressive framework, particularly on complex policy matters. The sample votes from 2005 show Green frequently opposing procedural motions (voting NAY on 'Ordering the Previous Question' and certain resolutions) while supporting motions to recommit, which often represent minority party efforts to amend or influence legislation. This pattern is consistent with a member operating from the minority perspective during that congressional session.

Key Positions

  • Strong supporter of defense legislation based on voting record
  • Active engagement on healthcare policy with selective voting approach
  • Support for agricultural measures affecting rural and farming communities
  • Consistent use of procedural votes to advocate for policy alternatives
  • Progressive positioning within the Democratic caucus

By Policy Area

Healthcare110
47% yea53% nay
Budget & Spending29
55% yea45% nay
Agriculture29
62% yea38% nay
Other10
70% yea30% nay
Banking & Finance10
50% yea50% nay
Defense6
83% yea17% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $7.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.2M

94%

PAC / Committees$84K

6%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$917K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$313K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$327K · 26%
$200 – 499
$38K · 3%
$500 – 999
$84K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$182K · 14%
$2,000+
$634K · 50%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (TX)$755K · 79%
Out-of-state$197K · 21%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

TX
$755K
CA
$54K
OK
$20K
LA
$13K
IL
$13K
MA
$12K
NY
$11K
IN
$10K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$163K
SELF-EMPLOYED$146K
NULL$41K
RICELAND HEALTHCARE$25K
NAIMEH SALEM & ASSOCIATES$16K
PYRAMIDS PHARMACY$16K
FAROUK SYSTEMS$13K
CHARITYSTACK$11K
ROCKY LAI & ASSOCIATES LTD.$11K
CHINA STAR RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC$11K
MEI INC.$11K
HOUSTON RHEUMATOLOGY CENTER$11K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$943K
Advertising
$439K
Administrative
$204K
Events
$120K
Fundraising
$68K
Refunds
$64K
Contributions
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

THE DANIELS GROUP LLC

$304K
2.

FOSTON INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS

$290K
3.

JOHNSTON CAMPAIGNS

$122K
4.

EA VENTURES

$122K
5.

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR

$72K
6.

WYNDHAM HOUSTON

$51K
7.

SWITCHBOARD PBC

$51K
8.

RUN2WIN

$45K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.7M

Operating Offsets

$8K

Net Operating

$1.7M

Loans

Candidate Loans

$400K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$78K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$1K

Opposing

$362.24

Total Outside Spending

$2K

Top Outside Spenders

01

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
02

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

-$362.24
$362.24
03

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$317.6
$317.6
04

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)

+$110.42
$110.42
05

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$50
$50
06

HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN PAC

+$22
$22
07

SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION

+$20
$20
08

HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN EQUALITY VOTES

+$13.5
$13.5

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 6/30/2026FEC: H4TX09095Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Al Green — U.S. Representative for Texas 9: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote