U.S. Representative
Angie Craig
Minnesota District 2
DemocratModerate Liberal
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 budget
49
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.27Moderate Liberal
Representative Angie Craig positions herself as a moderate liberal within the Democratic Party, with a voting record that is somewhat more centrist than the average House Democrat. Her NOMINATE score of -0.273 indicates she tends to vote with her party on most issues while occasionally breaking from the more progressive wing.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
49
total votes analyzed
Overview
Angie Craig represents Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District and has established herself as a pragmatic Democrat who often emphasizes bipartisan solutions. Her voting record reflects a center-left orientation, particularly on healthcare and agricultural issues relevant to her suburban and rural district. Craig's legislative focus appears weighted toward healthcare policy, where she has cast the majority of her recorded votes. Her support rate of 66% on healthcare measures suggests selective engagement with specific healthcare proposals rather than blanket support for all Democratic healthcare initiatives. Her attention to agriculture, with 67% support on related votes, reflects the needs of her Minnesota district, which includes both suburban communities in the Twin Cities area and rural agricultural regions. This geographic diversity likely influences her more moderate positioning within the Democratic caucus.
Key Positions
- •Generally supportive of Democratic healthcare initiatives with selective voting pattern
- •Engaged on agricultural policy relevant to her Minnesota district
- •Supports Democratic procedural measures and party priorities
- •Maintains moderate positioning relative to House Democratic caucus
- •Active participation in budget-related legislation with mixed support
By Policy Area
Healthcare32
66% yea34% nay
Budget & Spending9
56% yea44% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $33.6M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$2.3M
60%
PAC / Committees$808K
21%
Party Committee$10K
0%
Self-Funded$733K
19%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$1.7M
Small Dollar (<$200)
$550K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$48K · 5%
$200 – 499
$12K · 1%
$500 – 999
$32K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$145K · 17%
$2,000+
$640K · 73%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (MN)$390K · 47%
Out-of-state$447K · 53%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
MN
$390K
NY
$85K
FL
$80K
CA
$79K
MA
$44K
DC
$29K
TX
$25K
MD
$22K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$372K
SELF EMPLOYED$29K
PRETTYBROOK PARTNERS LLC$14K
CRESSET CAPITAL$10K
JOELE FRANK WILKINSON BRIMMER KATCHER$7K
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$7K
STRUCTURAL$7K
ICG$7K
COINBASE$7K
MILWAUKEE BUCKS$7K
PSD, LLC$7K
MORTENSON CONSTRUCTION$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Transfers
$596K
Loan-repayments
$373K
Other / Uncategorized
$342K
Refunds
$54K
Advertising
$49K
Administrative
$5K
Fundraising
$3K
Travel
$2K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$596K
ANGIE CRAIG FOR MINNESOTA
2.$375K
CRAIG, ANGELA DAWN
3.$43K
AUTHENTIC
4.$40K
GUSTO
5.$28K
ZAMANI, JASMINE N.
6.$23K
RELATIVE INTEL
7.$22K
HONSA-BINDER PRINTING, INC.
8.$21K
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$4.0M
Operating Offsets
$2K
Net Operating
$4.0M
Loans
Candidate Loans
$975K
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$9K
Committee Refunds
$1K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$5.0M
Opposing
$21.2M
Total Outside Spending
$26.1M
Top Outside Spenders
01
$16.1MNRCC
-$16.1M
02
$4.7MCONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND
-$4.7M
03
$1.9MFAIRSHAKE
+$1.9M
04
$759KSHIELD PAC
+$759K
05
$601KGIFFORDS PAC
+$601K
06
$478KVPP
+$478K
07
$469KPLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES
+$469K
08
$385KDEFEND US PAC
-$385K
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 4/1/2015 – 12/31/2016FEC: H6MN02131Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
46 votes across 6 categories