U.S. Representative
Christopher R. Deluzio
Pennsylvania District 17
DemocratModerate Liberal
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare
17
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.26Moderate Liberal
Representative Deluzio positions himself as a moderate liberal within the Democratic Party, with a voting record that is somewhat more centrist than the average House Democrat. His NOMINATE score of -0.257 places him in the center-left portion of the ideological spectrum, suggesting he may occasionally break from his party's more progressive wing on certain issues.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
17
total votes analyzed
Overview
Christopher Deluzio is a first-term Democratic Representative from Pennsylvania who has established a voting pattern that aligns with his party on most major issues while maintaining a slightly more moderate profile than many of his Democratic colleagues. His background as a veteran and election security expert appears to inform his legislative priorities. Based on his limited voting record, Deluzio has shown strong support for defense-related measures, voting in favor of such bills 100% of the time. His healthcare votes suggest he opposes Republican-led healthcare initiatives, voting against them approximately 73% of the time, which aligns with Democratic positions on preserving healthcare programs. The procedural votes in his record show consistent party-line voting on rules and resolutions, which is typical for members of the minority party. His willingness to support some bipartisan suspension bills in late 2024 indicates openness to cross-party cooperation on less contentious matters.
Key Positions
- •Supports Democratic positions on healthcare policy
- •Strong supporter of defense-related legislation
- •Opposes Republican-led procedural measures and resolutions
- •Willing to support bipartisan legislation under suspension of rules
- •More moderate than average House Democrat on overall voting record
By Policy Area
Healthcare11
27% yea73% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $11.1M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$2.2M
81%
PAC / Committees$512K
19%
Party Committee$19.55
0%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$1.5M
Small Dollar (<$200)
$750K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$879K · 39%
$200 – 499
$126K · 6%
$500 – 999
$184K · 8%
$1,000 – 1,999
$354K · 16%
$2,000+
$701K · 31%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (PA)$826K · 55%
Out-of-state$669K · 45%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
PA
$826K
NY
$193K
CA
$160K
MA
$46K
DC
$41K
VA
$38K
TX
$28K
FL
$15K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$663K
SELF EMPLOYED$180K
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$13K
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$9K
WALNUT CAPITAL$8K
ALLEGHENY FINANCIAL GROUP$8K
DE SHAW$7K
OLLIE'S BARGAIN OUTLET$7K
Q PRIME$7K
MORGAN LEWIS$7K
GLENVILLE GROUP$7K
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$1.4M
Advertising
$473K
Administrative
$138K
Contributions
$32K
Refunds
$10K
Fundraising
$8K
Travel
$5K
Materials
$4K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$929K
ASCEND DIGITAL STRATEGIES LLC
2.$340K
GUSTO
3.$164K
AMERICAN EXPRESS
4.$87K
CABBAGE HILL CONSULTING
5.$73K
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
6.$62K
LINDSEY SCHULTE CONSULTING LLC
7.$52K
NGP VAN
8.$50K
GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$2.0M
Operating Offsets
$10K
Net Operating
$2.0M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$12K
Committee Refunds
$2K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$2.6M
Opposing
$11.1M
Total Outside Spending
$13.7M
Top Outside Spenders
01
$7.0MNRCC
-$7.0M
02
$4.1MCONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND
-$4.1M
03
$1.7MDCCC
+$1.7M
04
$334KWITH HONOR FUND II, INC.
+$334K
05
$122KCENTER FOR ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
+$122K
06
$75KENGINEERS POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (EPEC)/INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
+$75K
07
$72KWORKING AMERICA
+$72K
08
$69KPLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES
+$69K
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2PA17103Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
14 votes across 4 categories