U.S. Representative
Dina Titus
Nevada District 1
DemocratModerate Liberal
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 agriculture#3 budget#4 other#5 banking finance
130
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.30Moderate Liberal
Representative Dina Titus is a moderate liberal Democrat whose voting record places her slightly to the right of her party's average. Her NOMINATE score of -0.297 indicates she holds progressive positions on most issues while occasionally breaking from her party on certain votes.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
130
total votes analyzed
Overview
Dina Titus has represented Nevada in the U.S. House of Representatives, serving a district that includes the Las Vegas area. Her voting record reflects a center-left approach that balances progressive Democratic priorities with the interests of her Nevada constituents. Her legislative activity shows significant engagement with healthcare policy, where she has cast 77 votes with a 47% 'yea' rate, suggesting she takes nuanced positions rather than voting uniformly on healthcare matters. She has shown strong support for education measures (100% yea on recorded votes) and has been active on defense-related legislation (67% yea). As a representative from a swing state with a tourism-dependent economy, Titus often focuses on issues relevant to Nevada's hospitality industry, transportation infrastructure, and public lands. Her moderate-liberal positioning may reflect the politically competitive nature of her district.
Key Positions
- •Strong support for education legislation
- •Active engagement on healthcare policy with selective voting approach
- •Support for defense-related measures
- •Moderate stance on budget and fiscal matters
- •Engagement with agriculture policy relevant to Nevada
By Policy Area
Healthcare77
47% yea53% nay
Agriculture13
54% yea46% nay
Budget & Spending13
62% yea38% nay
Other8
63% yea37% nay
Banking & Finance6
33% yea67% nay
Defense6
67% yea33% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $16.6M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$670K
47%
PAC / Committees$762K
53%
Party Committee$5K
0%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$619K
Small Dollar (<$200)
$51K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$74K · 10%
$200 – 499
$35K · 5%
$500 – 999
$85K · 11%
$1,000 – 1,999
$120K · 16%
$2,000+
$443K · 59%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (NV)$288K · 41%
Out-of-state$419K · 59%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
NV
$288K
CA
$104K
MA
$51K
NY
$48K
TX
$38K
DC
$26K
OK
$16K
VA
$14K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$178K
SELF EMPLOYED$69K
N/A$32K
EO SOLUTIONS$28K
NULL$11K
PARAGON GAMING$9K
MGM RESORTS$9K
STREAM LINE CIRCLE LLC$7K
BAIN CAPITAL, LLC$7K
BROWN, BROWN, & PREMSRITUT$7K
LAW OFFICES OF R. STEPHEN MCNALLY$7K
NATIONAL MATERIAL L.P.$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$318K
Administrative
$10K
Fundraising
$8K
Travel
$6K
Advertising
$4K
Contributions
$3K
Materials
$2K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$76K
KALIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2.$63K
GUSTO
3.$43K
TISSOT SOLUTIONS
4.$35K
NGP VAN
5.$27K
ACUITY POLITICS LLC
6.$20K
NEXT LEVEL PARTNERS, LLC
7.$15K
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
8.$6K
TITUS, DINA
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$346K
Operating Offsets
$9.01
Net Operating
$346K
Transfers
Transfers Out
$3K
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$390.29
Committee Refunds
$3K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$5.0M
Opposing
$12.8M
Total Outside Spending
$17.8M
Top Outside Spenders
01
$8.5MCONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND
-$8.5M
02
$2.9MNATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
-$2.9M
03
$2.1MDEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
+$2.1M
04
$1.2MAMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM
-$1.2M
05
$936KWORKERS VOTE
+$936K
06
$633KSEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)
+$633K
07
$400KLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS VICTORY FUND
+$400K
08
$309KOPPORTUNITY FOR ALL ACTION FUND
+$309K
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8NV03036Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
123 votes across 10 categories