U.S. Representative
Glenn Thompson
Pennsylvania District 15
RepublicanConservative
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 agriculture#3 budget#4 other#5 banking finance
150
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
0.34Conservative
Glenn Thompson is a conservative Republican who scores to the right of center on the ideological spectrum, though he positions himself more moderately than the average House Republican. His voting record suggests he aligns with traditional conservative principles while occasionally diverging from his party on certain issues.
LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg
More liberal than the average Republican (0.52)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
150
total votes analyzed
Overview
Representative Glenn Thompson has served Pennsylvania in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Republican member. His voting record demonstrates consistent conservative positions, particularly in areas of defense, education, and banking/finance, where he has shown strong support for legislation in these domains. Thompson's most active area of legislative engagement has been healthcare, where he has cast 93 recorded votes with a 67% rate of voting in favor of measures that came before him. His agricultural voting record, with 16 votes at 63% approval, reflects the importance of farming and rural issues to his Pennsylvania district. On budgetary matters, Thompson has been more selective, supporting only 38% of budget-related measures, suggesting fiscal conservative tendencies and careful scrutiny of spending proposals. His 100% support rate on defense-related votes indicates strong backing for military and national security initiatives.
Key Positions
- •Strong supporter of defense and military legislation (100% support)
- •Active engagement on healthcare policy issues
- •Consistent support for education-related measures
- •Supportive of banking and financial services legislation (83% support)
- •More conservative approach to budget and spending measures
- •Engaged on agricultural policy reflecting rural district interests
By Policy Area
Healthcare93
67% yea33% nay
Agriculture16
63% yea37% nay
Budget & Spending13
38% yea62% nay
Other8
63% yea37% nay
Banking & Finance6
83% yea17% nay
Defense6
100% yea0% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $15.8M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$738K
42%
PAC / Committees$1.0M
58%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$699K
Small Dollar (<$200)
$39K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$46K · 6%
$200 – 499
$35K · 4%
$500 – 999
$105K · 13%
$1,000 – 1,999
$240K · 30%
$2,000+
$382K · 47%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (PA)$409K · 53%
Out-of-state$361K · 47%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
PA
$409K
TX
$53K
MS
$40K
CA
$29K
OT
$25K
IN
$23K
WA
$21K
FL
$20K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NULL$90K
SELF$80K
RETIRED$58K
HOMEMAKER$20K
GS FOODS GROUP$11K
COINBASE$10K
KRIEBEL GAS$10K
BEST LINE EQUIPMENT$8K
PENN UNITED TOOL$8K
SUPERIOR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPA$7K
GLENN O'HAWBAKER INC$7K
ACCU WEATHER$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Contributions
$416K
Transfers
$139K
Fundraising
$92K
Travel
$31K
Materials
$21K
Administrative
$20K
Refunds
$9K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$520K
NRCC
2.$368K
DISTRICT CITY CONSULTING
3.$174K
GUSTO
4.$61K
CFS COMPLIANCE
5.$54K
HEMLOCK DIGITAL STRATEGIES LLC
6.$53K
DAVID BRENT CONSULTANTS, INC.
7.$49K
THE RUSSELL ORGANIZATION
8.$34K
ASSETTA, CHERYL MARCIE
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$1.1M
Operating Offsets
$2K
Net Operating
$1.1M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$10K
Committee Refunds
$8K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$123K
Opposing
$2K
Total Outside Spending
$125K
Top Outside Spenders
01
$72KNATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
+$72K
02
$26KCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC.
+$26K
03
$22KNATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND
+$22K
04
$2KPENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION PAC
+$2K
05
$861.86EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND
-$861.86
06
$750TOGETHER WE THRIVE
-$750
07
$678.05HUNTER ACTION FUND (HAF)
+$678.05
08
$633.83RURAL FREEDOM NETWORK
-$633.83
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8PA05071Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
144 votes across 12 categories