U.S. Representative
Grace Meng
New York District 6
DemocratProgressive
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 other#4 defense#5 agriculture
103
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.37Progressive
Representative Grace Meng holds a progressive voting record with an ideology score of -0.370, placing her slightly to the right of the average House Democrat (-0.380). Her voting pattern aligns closely with mainstream Democratic positions while occasionally showing modest departures from the party's left wing.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
103
total votes analyzed
Overview
Grace Meng represents New York in the U.S. House of Representatives and has compiled a voting record across 103 recorded votes that spans multiple policy areas. Her most active area of voting has been healthcare, where she has cast 67 votes with a 48% rate of voting in favor of the measures presented. Her voting pattern on procedural matters shows consistent opposition to Republican-led procedural motions, such as ordering the previous question and agreeing to resolutions, while supporting Democratic procedural alternatives like motions to recommit with instructions. This reflects typical partisan positioning on House floor procedures. In fiscal matters, Representative Meng has shown a slightly higher rate of support for budget-related legislation (56% yea) compared to other categories. Her votes on banking and finance legislation show a more skeptical approach, with 0% support across 3 recorded votes in that category.
Key Positions
- •Consistent opposition to Republican procedural motions in the House
- •Moderate support for budget legislation (56% yea rate)
- •Skeptical stance on banking and financial legislation
- •Support for education-related measures (100% yea on recorded vote)
- •Mixed voting record on healthcare legislation (48% yea rate)
By Policy Area
Healthcare67
48% yea52% nay
Budget & Spending9
56% yea44% nay
Other7
43% yea57% nay
Defense6
50% yea50% nay
Agriculture5
40% yea60% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $12.7M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$1.3M
70%
PAC / Committees$575K
30%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$1.3M
Small Dollar (<$200)
$22K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$25K · 2%
$200 – 499
$45K · 3%
$500 – 999
$242K · 17%
$1,000 – 1,999
$288K · 20%
$2,000+
$867K · 59%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (NY)$1.0M · 70%
Out-of-state$441K · 30%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
NY
$1.0M
CT
$71K
NJ
$70K
CA
$68K
MD
$46K
FL
$31K
DC
$30K
GA
$16K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$397K
SELF EMPLOYED$97K
SELF$58K
NULL$36K
ANTHROPIC$17K
AMPAC INDUSTRIAL$14K
KIMCO REALTY$11K
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$11K
REESE LLP$11K
THEGROUP$10K
SCHONFELD STRATEGIC ADVISORS$8K
INNOVET$8K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$1.2M
Advertising
$241K
Contributions
$216K
Transfers
$125K
Fundraising
$84K
Materials
$60K
Administrative
$53K
Travel
$7K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$498K
RED HORSE STRATEGIES
2.$330K
DCCC
3.$145K
THE FROST GROUP
4.$98K
KARIS CONSULTING
5.$90K
DITTO CONSULTING INC
6.$77K
FELDMAN, AARON
7.$62K
PAYCHEX
8.$58K
GLOBAL STRATEGY GROUP, LLC
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$1.6M
Operating Offsets
$352.32
Net Operating
$1.6M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$9K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$238K
Opposing
$0
Total Outside Spending
$238K
Top Outside Spenders
01
$205KWOMEN VOTE!
+$205K
02
$19KCOMMON SENSE NEW YORKERS INC.
+$19K
03
$9KHUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUND
+$9K
04
$4KHEROES UNITED PAC, DBA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, DBA ASSOCIATION OF POLICE & FIRST RESPONDERS
+$4K
05
$350SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE
+$350
06
$123.73PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES
+$123.73
07
$30SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
+$30
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2NY06116Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
95 votes across 10 categories