U.S. Representative
Greg Landsman
Ohio District 1
DemocratModerate Liberal
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare
17
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.23Moderate Liberal
Greg Landsman's voting record places him as a moderate liberal within the Democratic Party, with a NOMINATE score of -0.228 compared to the Democratic average of -0.380. This indicates he tends to vote somewhat more conservatively than the typical House Democrat, positioning him closer to the ideological center.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
17
total votes analyzed
Overview
Greg Landsman represents Ohio in the U.S. House as a Democrat who has carved out a position as a moderate voice within his party. His voting patterns suggest he occasionally diverges from party leadership on certain issues, which is reflected in his more centrist ideological score. Based on his recorded votes, Landsman has shown strong support for defense-related measures, voting in favor 100% of the time on such issues. His healthcare voting record shows he opposed most healthcare-related measures that came to a vote (27% yea), though the specific context of these votes would determine whether this reflects opposition to Republican-led initiatives or other factors. Landsman's procedural votes indicate he generally aligns with his party on floor procedure matters, consistently voting against Republican-led previous question motions and resolutions. He has shown willingness to support bipartisan suspension bills, which typically require two-thirds majority and often represent less controversial legislation.
Key Positions
- •Consistent support for defense-related legislation
- •Opposition to majority-party procedural motions
- •Support for bipartisan suspension bills
- •Moderate positioning within the Democratic caucus
By Policy Area
Healthcare11
27% yea73% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $11.1M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$2.8M
74%
PAC / Committees$971K
26%
Party Committee$6K
0%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$2.6M
Small Dollar (<$200)
$243K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$303K · 8%
$200 – 499
$124K · 3%
$500 – 999
$307K · 8%
$1,000 – 1,999
$623K · 17%
$2,000+
$2.3M · 63%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (OH)$821K · 24%
Out-of-state$2.6M · 76%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
OH
$821K
NY
$778K
CA
$443K
MA
$185K
IL
$151K
MD
$149K
FL
$131K
CT
$119K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$1.4M
SELF EMPLOYED$301K
INSIGHT PARTNERS$21K
BLACKSTONE$15K
BGR GROUP$15K
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$14K
REMINGTON ROAD GROUP$14K
LAUDER PARTNERS LLC$14K
CHAVEZ PROPERTIES$14K
CENTERVIEW PARTNERS$14K
BESSEMER VENTURE PARTNERS$14K
DE SHAW & CO$14K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$935K
Advertising
$82K
Administrative
$70K
Fundraising
$42K
Refunds
$27K
Travel
$24K
Contributions
$9K
Materials
$5K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$287K
GUSTO
2.$145K
ANGERHOLZER BROZ CONSULTING
3.$62K
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
4.$54K
TECHNICOLOR POLITICAL
5.$45K
BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS LLC
6.$43K
NGP VAN INC
7.$39K
DEMOCRACY ENGINE
8.$35K
LEVINSON, JEREMY
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$1.2M
Operating Offsets
$14K
Net Operating
$1.1M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$9K
Committee Refunds
$19K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$1.3M
Opposing
$6.3M
Total Outside Spending
$7.6M
Top Outside Spenders
01
$3.7MNRCC
-$3.7M
02
$2.3MCONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND
-$2.3M
03
$571KOHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN
+$471K-$100K
04
$333KDCCC
+$333K
05
$132KWOMEN SPEAK OUT PAC
-$132K
06
$118KCLIMATE POWER ACTION
+$118K
07
$113KTOGETHER FOR OHIO'S FUTURE PAC
+$113K
08
$100KCOMMUNITY CHANGE VOTERS
+$100K
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2OH01194Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
14 votes across 4 categories