U.S. Representative
H. Morgan Griffith
Virginia District 9
RepublicanConservative
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 agriculture#4 other#5 defense
122
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
0.51Conservative
Representative Griffith holds conservative positions that align closely with the Republican Party mainstream, with an ideology score of 0.510 on a scale where 1 is most conservative. His voting record places him slightly more moderate than the average House Republican, though he remains firmly within the conservative camp on most issues.
LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg
Near the average for Republicans (0.52)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
122
total votes analyzed
Overview
H. Morgan Griffith has represented Virginia in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Republican member with a consistent conservative voting record. His legislative activity shows particular focus on healthcare policy, where he has cast the majority of his recorded votes, along with engagement on budget, agriculture, and defense matters. Griffith's voting patterns demonstrate strong support for defense-related measures, with 100% support on defense votes in the record, as well as consistent backing of banking and finance legislation. His healthcare voting record shows support for approximately two-thirds of the healthcare measures that came before him, suggesting selective engagement with health policy proposals. On budget matters, his record shows more mixed voting patterns, supporting roughly 44% of budget-related measures. This suggests a willingness to oppose some spending proposals, consistent with fiscal conservative principles common among Republicans representing rural districts.
Key Positions
- •Strong supporter of defense legislation with 100% support rate on defense votes
- •Active engagement on healthcare policy with majority support for healthcare measures
- •Consistent opposition to Democratic procedural motions (Motions to Recommit)
- •Support for banking and financial services legislation
- •Selective approach to budget and spending measures
By Policy Area
Healthcare83
67% yea33% nay
Budget & Spending9
44% yea56% nay
Agriculture7
57% yea43% nay
Other7
71% yea29% nay
Defense6
100% yea0% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $9.9M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$549K
31%
PAC / Committees$1.2M
69%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$531K
Small Dollar (<$200)
$18K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$22K · 4%
$200 – 499
$8K · 1%
$500 – 999
$64K · 11%
$1,000 – 1,999
$143K · 25%
$2,000+
$331K · 58%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (VA)$231K · 42%
Out-of-state$319K · 58%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
VA
$231K
DC
$53K
NY
$43K
TX
$38K
MD
$37K
CA
$22K
FL
$18K
NC
$14K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
SELF EMPLOYED$53K
RETIRED$39K
TL MANAGEMENT$21K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$15K
HOMEMAKER$15K
BGR GROUP$11K
CONSULTANT$8K
MEADOW PARK$7K
ALSTON BIRD LLP$7K
CENTRAL COAL CO$7K
HS DESIGN$7K
THE STANTON PARK GROUP$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Contributions
$546K
Other / Uncategorized
$531K
Fundraising
$101K
Administrative
$30K
Advertising
$17K
Travel
$9K
Materials
$1K
Refunds
$1K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$481K
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
2.$210K
KB STRATEGIC GROUP
3.$67K
FEINSTEIN, BRETT
4.$60K
HAULIK, JAYCE
5.$59K
FOREST CONSULTING SERVICES
6.$39K
I77 STRATEGIES
7.$24K
UNITED STATES TREASURY
8.$23K
CAPITOL HILL CLUB
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$751K
Operating Offsets
$3K
Net Operating
$748K
Transfers
Transfers Out
$500
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$10K
Committee Refunds
$1K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$318K
Opposing
$2K
Total Outside Spending
$319K
Top Outside Spenders
01
$188KNATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
+$188K
02
$74KFOUNDATION FOR A SECURE AND PROSPEROUS AMERICA
+$74K
03
$30KNATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
+$30K
04
$7KHOUSE FREEDOM FUND
+$7K
05
$6KAMERICANS FOR JOB SECURITY
+$6K
06
$5KVIRGINIA SOCIETY FOR HUMAN LIFE INC-POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
+$5K
07
$5KAMERICANS IN CONTACT PAC
+$5K
08
$3KAMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM
+$3K
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 7/15/2026FEC: H0VA09055Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
116 votes across 12 categories