U.S. Senator
Jacky Rosen
Nevada
DemocratModerate Liberal
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare#2 other#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 social security
116
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.29Moderate Liberal
Senator Rosen's voting record places her in the moderate liberal range of the political spectrum, though she positions slightly more toward the center than the average Democrat. Her NOMINATE score of -0.286 suggests she occasionally breaks from her party on certain issues, reflecting Nevada's status as a competitive swing state.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
116
total votes analyzed
Overview
Jacky Rosen represents Nevada in the U.S. Senate as a Democrat, having previously served in the House of Representatives before her 2018 Senate election. Her voting pattern reflects a pragmatic approach that balances progressive priorities with moderate positions on select issues. Her legislative focus appears strongest in healthcare, where she has cast the majority of her recorded votes, and defense, where she shows notably high support at 88% in favor. Her strong support for defense-related measures distinguishes her from some members of her party and may reflect Nevada's significant military presence and veteran population. On environmental and energy issues, Senator Rosen votes in favor approximately 69% of the time, indicating general alignment with Democratic environmental priorities while maintaining some flexibility. Her infrastructure votes show unanimous support in the recorded sample, suggesting strong backing for investment in physical infrastructure.
Key Positions
- •Strong supporter of defense and military-related legislation (88% support rate)
- •Consistent support for infrastructure investment measures
- •Generally supportive of environmental and energy initiatives
- •Active engagement on healthcare policy with mixed voting patterns
- •Opposition to certain budget and agriculture measures in recorded votes
By Policy Area
Healthcare57
60% yea40% nay
Other19
58% yea42% nay
Environment & Energy16
69% yea31% nay
Defense8
88% yea12% nay
Social Security6
50% yea50% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $79.9M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$1.0M
85%
PAC / Committees$188K
15%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$563K
Small Dollar (<$200)
$480K
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$753K · 71%
$200 – 499
$65K · 6%
$500 – 999
$41K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$68K · 6%
$2,000+
$134K · 13%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (NV)$110K · 19%
Out-of-state$471K · 81%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
CA
$152K
NV
$110K
NY
$56K
DC
$33K
FL
$28K
VA
$25K
MA
$21K
TX
$18K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$333K
SELF EMPLOYED$40K
NONE$12K
LUX CAPITAL$7K
ARGENT MANAGEMENT, LLC$7K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$7K
CARNIVAL CORPORATION$7K
CLOTHIA, INC.$7K
HOMEBREW$5K
CAFFEINATED CAPITAL$5K
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.$5K
IMPERIUM GLOBAL ADVISORS$4K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Contributions
$650K
Administrative
$169K
Fundraising
$129K
Refunds
$51K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$650K
DSCC
2.$218K
PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING
3.$167K
FULKERSON, KENNEDY & COMPANY
4.$149K
AMERICAN EXPRESS
5.$130K
ANNE LEWIS STRATEGIES LLC
6.$122K
RWT PRODUCTION, LLC
7.$112K
NGP VAN, INC.
8.$87K
MBA CONSULTING GROUP
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$1.4M
Operating Offsets
$122K
Net Operating
$1.3M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$63K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$5.0M
Opposing
$81.2M
Total Outside Spending
$86.2M
Top Outside Spenders
01
$30.8MSENATE LEADERSHIP FUND
-$30.8M
02
$24.4MNRSC
-$24.4M
03
$20.4MWIN IT BACK PAC
-$20.4M
04
$3.7MSTATE ACTION FUND PAC INC.
-$3.7M
05
$1.9MAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION
-$1.9M
06
$1.2MNEW AMERICAN JOBS FUND
+$1.2M
07
$924KNEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE
+$924K
08
$876KEDF ACTION VOTES
+$876K
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: S8NV00156Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
95 votes across 11 categories