Official portrait of Jamie Raskin, U.S. Representative for Maryland

U.S. Representative

Jamie Raskin

Maryland District 8

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

61

across 8 categories

65 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-5341Official Website2242 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-2008

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

65 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 other

65

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.50Progressive

Jamie Raskin positions himself on the progressive end of the Democratic Party, with a voting record more liberal than the average House Democrat. His NOMINATE score of -0.504 places him firmly in the progressive wing, reflecting consistent support for expanding government programs and social policy reforms.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

65

total votes analyzed

Overview

Representative Jamie Raskin has served Maryland in the U.S. House with a focus on healthcare legislation, which comprises the majority of his recorded votes. His voting pattern shows strong alignment with Democratic Party positions, particularly on procedural votes where he consistently opposes Republican-led measures. Raskin's legislative activity spans multiple policy areas, with notable engagement in healthcare (41 votes), budget matters (9 votes), and agricultural issues (3 votes). His voting record suggests prioritization of healthcare access and government program expansion. As a constitutional law professor before entering Congress, Raskin brings an academic perspective to legislative work. His voting patterns reflect a commitment to progressive policy goals while operating within the Democratic caucus framework.

Key Positions

  • Consistent support for healthcare-related legislation (59% approval rate on healthcare votes)
  • Opposition to Republican procedural motions (Previous Question votes)
  • Support for defense-related measures when they reach the floor
  • Active engagement on budget and fiscal policy matters

By Policy Area

Healthcare41
59% yea41% nay
Budget & Spending9
56% yea44% nay
Other7
57% yea43% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $22.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$6.5M

94%

PAC / Committees$395K

6%

Party Committee$1K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$3.5M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$3.1M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$4.2M · 61%
$200 – 499
$494K · 7%
$500 – 999
$526K · 8%
$1,000 – 1,999
$640K · 9%
$2,000+
$983K · 14%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (MD)$1.3M · 33%
Out-of-state$2.5M · 67%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

MD
$1.3M
CA
$494K
NY
$393K
DC
$247K
MA
$216K
FL
$157K
PA
$103K
VA
$95K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$2.3M
SELF-EMPLOYED$385K
NULL$29K
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$18K
ROM-RYMER AND ASSOCIATES$11K
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$8K
INFORMATION REQUESTED$8K
INTRAFI$7K
LONE PINE CAPITAL$7K
ALSOP LOUIE PARTNERS$7K
ARNOLD VENTURES$7K
STAND UP AMERICA$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$3.2M
Administrative
$662K
Contributions
$362K
Materials
$118K
Transfers
$65K
Refunds
$41K
Fundraising
$31K
Advertising
$12K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

AISLE 518 STRATEGIES

$1.3M
2.

PAYCHEX

$481K
3.

GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS, INC.

$453K
4.

DCCC

$340K
5.

NGP VAN INC.

$318K
6.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$216K
7.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$197K
8.

HM CONSULTING

$197K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$4.0M

Operating Offsets

$58K

Net Operating

$3.9M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$50K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$103K

Opposing

$0

Total Outside Spending

$103K

Top Outside Spenders

01

FREETHOUGHT EQUALITY SUPER PAC

+$72K
$72K
02

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$13K
$13K
03

NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION

+$10K
$10K
04

MAYDAY PAC

+$8K
$8K
05

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$123.73
$123.73
06

SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION

+$40
$40
07

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$30
$30

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 6/30/2026FEC: H6MD08457Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Jamie Raskin — U.S. Representative for Maryland 8: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote