U.S. Representative
Jasmine Crockett
Texas District 30
DemocratProgressive
Contact
Voting Profile
Legislative Record
Most Active Policy Areas
#1 healthcare
17
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Ideology Spectrum
-0.50Progressive
Representative Jasmine Crockett positions herself on the progressive end of the Democratic Party, with a voting record more liberal than the average House Democrat. Her NOMINATE score of -0.502 reflects consistent alignment with progressive policy positions.
LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg
More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
Category Breakdown
17
total votes analyzed
Overview
Jasmine Crockett serves as a Democratic Representative from Texas, having joined Congress relatively recently. Her voting record, though limited to 17 recorded votes in this dataset, shows strong alignment with Democratic Party positions on procedural matters and policy legislation. On healthcare-related votes, Representative Crockett has voted 'yea' approximately 18% of the time, suggesting she has opposed several healthcare measures that came to the floor—likely Republican-sponsored bills given the chamber's majority during this period. Her defense-related votes show 100% support for the measures that came before her. Her procedural votes demonstrate consistent opposition to Republican-led motions, including voting against 'Previous Question' motions and resolutions that would advance majority party priorities. This pattern is typical for a member of the minority party operating within normal partisan dynamics.
Key Positions
- •Consistently opposes Republican procedural motions as a minority party member
- •Supports Democratic positions on healthcare policy
- •Voted in favor of defense-related measures
- •Has shown willingness to support bipartisan suspension bills
By Policy Area
Healthcare11
18% yea82% nay
Analysis updated: January 9, 2026
Campaign Finance
Follow the Money
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →
Career: $12.1M
Fundraising Over Time
Raised per election cycleSpent
Contribution Sources
Individual$7.7M
98%
PAC / Committees$169K
2%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$1.9M
Small Dollar (<$200)
$5.8M
Donation Sizes
Under $200
$6.4M · 83%
$200 – 499
$250K · 3%
$500 – 999
$245K · 3%
$1,000 – 1,999
$278K · 4%
$2,000+
$512K · 7%
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
In-state (TX)$384K · 20%
Out-of-state$1.5M · 80%
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
CA
$462K
TX
$384K
NY
$136K
FL
$99K
GA
$79K
MA
$55K
WA
$50K
IL
$50K
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
NOT EMPLOYED$878K
SELF EMPLOYED$206K
PALS INC.$14K
WITHERSPOON LAW$9K
LINKEDIN$8K
THE NATURY CONSERVANCY$7K
SFSU$7K
Q PRIME$7K
AIRMAN SERVICES INC .$7K
DANIEL LAURENT FILMS INC$7K
KELLEY LAW FIRM$7K
EVERGREEN MONEY$7K
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Transfers
$4.9M
Other / Uncategorized
$4.6M
Refunds
$64K
Contributions
$6K
Advertising
$6K
Fundraising
$4K
Materials
$4K
Administrative
$2K
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
1.$4.9M
JASMINE FOR TEXAS
2.$2.5M
BLUE CHIP STRATEGIES
3.$455K
CITI BANK
4.$331K
DIGITAL STRATEGY GROUP
5.$303K
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
6.$284K
SEGMENT INSIGHT LLC
7.$186K
BERGER HIRSCHBERG STRATEGIES
8.$64K
NGP VAN
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$4.6M
Operating Offsets
$21K
Net Operating
$4.6M
Transfers
Transfers Out
$4.9M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$77K
Committee Refunds
$7K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$7.4M
Opposing
$25K
Total Outside Spending
$7.4M
Top Outside Spenders
01
$4.0MPROTECT OUR FUTURE PAC
+$4.0M
02
$2.9MWEB3 FORWARD
+$2.9M
03
$200KBLACK VOTERS MATTER ACTION PAC
+$200K
04
$154KTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
+$154K
05
$92KWFP NATIONAL PAC
+$92K
06
$34KOPPORTUNITY FOR TOMORROW
+$34K
07
$25KTEXAS JUSTICE FUND
-$25K
08
$416.94COMMUNITY CHANGE VOTERS
+$416.94
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2TX30178Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Voting Record
Congressional Votes
14 votes across 4 categories