Official portrait of Mark Takano, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Mark Takano

California District 39

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

95

across 10 categories

102 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-2305Official Website2078 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0539

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

102 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 other#4 defense

102

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.46Progressive

Representative Mark Takano is a progressive Democrat whose voting record places him to the left of his party's average. His NOMINATE score of -0.456 indicates consistently liberal positions on most policy matters, reflecting the priorities of his California district.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

102

total votes analyzed

Overview

Mark Takano has served in the U.S. House representing California, establishing a voting record that aligns with progressive Democratic priorities. His legislative activity spans multiple policy areas, with particular focus on healthcare-related legislation, where he has cast the majority of his recorded votes. Takano's voting patterns show strong party loyalty, frequently voting against Republican-led procedural motions and supporting Democratic alternatives through motions to recommit. His positions on banking and finance legislation show consistent opposition to measures that came to the floor during his tenure. On defense matters, Takano has supported a majority of the defense-related bills he's voted on, suggesting a nuanced approach that doesn't simply oppose all military spending despite his progressive orientation. His healthcare voting record shows more selectivity, with support for less than half of the healthcare measures brought to vote.

Key Positions

  • Consistently opposes Republican procedural motions and rule changes
  • Selective approach to healthcare legislation with 46% support rate
  • Supports majority of defense-related measures brought to vote
  • Strong opposition to banking and finance legislation during his tenure
  • Supports Democratic alternative proposals through motions to recommit

By Policy Area

Healthcare67
46% yea54% nay
Budget & Spending9
56% yea44% nay
Other7
57% yea43% nay
Defense6
67% yea33% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $10.2M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$478K

54%

PAC / Committees$405K

46%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$371K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$107K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$133K · 28%
$200 – 499
$17K · 4%
$500 – 999
$35K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$61K · 13%
$2,000+
$236K · 49%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$266K · 71%
Out-of-state$109K · 29%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA
$266K
NY
$30K
DC
$22K
FL
$14K
HI
$13K
MO
$12K
MD
$3K
NM
$3K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$69K
SELF-EMPLOYED$58K
RETIRED$19K
KELLER ANDERLE SCOLNICK LLP$14K
NOT EMPLOYED$10K
NULL$10K
COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY, PC$7K
VETERANS UNITED HOME LOANS$7K
WARNER BROTHERS$7K
NEW PACIFIC REALTY CORP.$7K
WELLS FARGO$7K
BROOKHILL CORP.$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$802K
Transfers
$100K
Contributions
$33K
Refunds
$19K
Fundraising
$18K
Travel
$3K
Materials
$2K
Administrative
$508.75

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

VAN NESS CREATIVE STRATEGIES

$222K
2.

GUSTO

$191K
3.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$100K
4.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (DCCC)

$100K
5.

ROLLA GROUP LLC

$89K
6.

MOMENTUM CAMPAIGNS LLC

$39K
7.

RISING BLUE CONSULTING

$30K
8.

PAPERCLIP CONSULTING INC.

$26K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$819K

Operating Offsets

$2K

Net Operating

$817K

Transfers

Transfers Out

$100K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$19K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$520K

Opposing

$440K

Total Outside Spending

$960K

Top Outside Spenders

01

US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

-$440K
$440K
02

EQUALITY PROJECT PAC

+$282K
$282K
03

CALIFORNIANS FOR SACRED SITES PROTECTION

+$144K
$144K
04

NATIONAL NURSES UNITED FOR PATIENT PROTECTION

+$70K
$70K
05

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PAC

+$11K
$11K
06

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST

+$6K
$6K
07

PROTECTING OUR VOTE PAC

+$2K
$2K
08

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$2K
$2K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA43245Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)