Official portrait of Rashida Tlaib, U.S. Representative for Michigan

U.S. Representative

Rashida Tlaib

Michigan District 12

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

46

across 6 categories

49 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-5126Official Website2438 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-2212

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

49 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget

49

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.29Moderate Liberal

Representative Tlaib's voting record places her in the moderate liberal range of the political spectrum, though she is positioned slightly more toward the center compared to the average House Democrat. Her NOMINATE score of -0.290 indicates consistent progressive voting patterns while occasionally diverging from the most liberal positions within her party.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

49

total votes analyzed

Overview

Rashida Tlaib represents Michigan in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat. Her voting record demonstrates strong support for healthcare legislation, with a 66% approval rate on healthcare-related votes, and consistent backing of education and defense measures that have come before her. On budget matters, Representative Tlaib shows more selective support, voting in favor of approximately 44% of budget-related legislation. This suggests she applies specific criteria when evaluating fiscal policy, potentially weighing spending priorities against other considerations. Her overall voting pattern reflects alignment with Democratic Party positions on most issues, though her ideology score indicates she occasionally takes positions that place her closer to the political center than many of her Democratic colleagues. This positioning may reflect the priorities and perspectives of her Michigan constituents.

Key Positions

  • Supports healthcare legislation at higher rates than budget measures
  • Consistent support for education-related bills
  • Backs defense legislation that comes to a vote
  • More selective approach to budget and fiscal policy
  • Generally aligns with Democratic procedural votes

By Policy Area

Healthcare32
66% yea34% nay
Budget & Spending9
44% yea56% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $20.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.5M

92%

PAC / Committees$140K

8%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.2M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$262K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$1.2M · 47%
$200 – 499
$128K · 5%
$500 – 999
$175K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$305K · 12%
$2,000+
$750K · 29%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (MI)$129K · 7%
Out-of-state$1.6M · 93%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA
$500K
NY
$179K
MI
$129K
WA
$127K
OH
$125K
MA
$103K
NJ
$90K
FL
$88K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$615K
SELF EMPLOYED$224K
ACCESS$22K
MICROSOFT$20K
CHAMI LAW FIRM$14K
THE PRESSURE GROUT COMPANY$13K
IRIS HOTEL$12K
NONE$10K
FAMVANS$9K
WALKUP MELODIA$9K
STONE SOUP$8K
BBN TECHNOLOGIES$8K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$2.3M
Contributions
$515K
Advertising
$88K
Administrative
$64K
Fundraising
$42K
Travel
$34K
Refunds
$22K
Materials
$5K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

$777K
2.

THE NEW MEDIA FIRM, INC.

$397K
3.

JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC

$350K
4.

SUMMIT CAMPAIGN STRATEGIES

$239K
5.

AVIMA DESIGN

$78K
6.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$75K
7.

MBA CONSULTING GROUP

$72K
8.

NGP VAN, INC.

$68K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.6M

Net Operating

$1.6M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$35K

Committee Refunds

$5K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$387K

Opposing

$340K

Total Outside Spending

$727K

Top Outside Spenders

01

HONORING AMERICAN LAW ENFORCEMENT PAC

-$128K
$128K
02

LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A SAFER AMERICA PAC

-$128K
$128K
03

WFP IE COMMITTEE

+$111K
$111K
04

MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION

+$90K
$90K
05

FRIENDS OF THE EARTH (ACTION) INC

+$41K
$41K
06

MICHIGAN ACTION - FEDERAL ACCOUNT

+$39K
$39K
07

DRAIN THE DC SWAMP PAC

-$27K
$27K
08

WE DECIDE

-$23K
$23K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 12/1/2017 12/31/2018FEC: H8MI13250Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)