Official portrait of Richard E. Neal, U.S. Representative for Massachusetts

U.S. Representative

Richard E. Neal

Massachusetts District 1

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

321

across 13 categories

332 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-5601Official Website372 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-2101

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

332 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 agriculture#4 defense#5 banking finance

332

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.42Progressive

Representative Neal's voting record and ideology score place him in the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, slightly more liberal than the average House Democrat. His long tenure in Congress has seen consistent alignment with Democratic positions on economic and social policy matters.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

332

total votes analyzed

Overview

Richard Neal has served in the U.S. House of Representatives for over three decades, representing Massachusetts. His voting record reflects a center-left to progressive approach, with particular focus on fiscal policy, healthcare, and economic matters. With 332 recorded votes across multiple policy areas, Neal has demonstrated strong engagement on healthcare legislation, where he has voted on 166 measures with a 46% yea rate, suggesting careful deliberation on specific healthcare proposals rather than uniform support. His budget voting shows higher support at 62%, and defense-related measures receive considerable backing at 80%. As a longtime member of the House, Neal has participated in significant legislative moments spanning multiple administrations. His voting patterns show a willingness to support bipartisan measures in certain areas, particularly defense and some budget matters, while maintaining core Democratic positions on social and economic policy.

Key Positions

  • Consistent support for Democratic healthcare policy frameworks
  • Strong backing of defense-related legislation (80% support)
  • Active engagement on budget and fiscal matters
  • Support for agriculture-related measures (59% approval)
  • Progressive voting record slightly left of party average

By Policy Area

Healthcare166
46% yea54% nay
Budget & Spending68
62% yea38% nay
Agriculture46
59% yea41% nay
Defense15
80% yea20% nay
Banking & Finance12
42% yea58% nay
Other11
64% yea36% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $32.1M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$151K

63%

PAC / Committees$87K

36%

Party Committee$1K

1%

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$10K · 2%
$200 – 499
$13K · 2%
$500 – 999
$73K · 11%
$1,000 – 1,999
$217K · 34%
$2,000+
$328K · 51%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (MA)$192K · 30%
Out-of-state$440K · 70%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

MA
$192K
DC
$82K
NY
$63K
CA
$43K
VA
$36K
MD
$34K
CT
$30K
MI
$26K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NONE$28K
KKR$28K
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS$28K
NOT EMPLOYED$23K
WILMERHALE$23K
WINGED KEEL GROUP$18K
NFP$15K
LEFRAK$14K
N/A$11K
WINN COMPANIES$10K
ARNOLD VENTURES$7K
PIVOTAL VENTURES$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.7M
Contributions
$354K
Administrative
$10K
Refunds
$2K
Advertising
$2K
Travel
$946.16
Fundraising
$854
Events
$736

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$654K
2.

DCCC

$580K
3.

CHECKWRITERS PAYROLL

$199K
4.

C&G ASSOCIATES

$180K
5.

BRENDAN NEAL STRATEGIES LLC

$85K
6.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

$52K
7.

DAPA RESEARCH, INC.

$37K
8.

HALL, MICHAEL F.

$30K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$187K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$747K

Opposing

$1.7M

Total Outside Spending

$2.4M

Top Outside Spenders

01

JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC

-$700K
$700K
02

FIGHT CORPORATE MONOPOLIES

-$650K
$650K
03

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC

+$510K
$510K
04

INDIVISIBLE ACTION

-$302K
$302K
05

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

+$126K
$126K
06

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC

+$55K
$55K
07

AMERICAN WORKING FAMILIES

+$26K
$26K
08

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE

+$20K
$20K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

FEC: H8MA02041Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)