Official portrait of Rick Larsen, U.S. Representative for Washington

U.S. Representative

Rick Larsen

Washington District 2

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

246

across 12 categories

245 analyzed in depth

Contact

202-225-2605Official Website2163 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4702

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

245 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 budget#3 agriculture#4 other#5 banking finance

245

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.36Progressive

Representative Rick Larsen is a progressive Democrat whose voting record places him slightly to the right of his party's average. His ideology score of -0.365 indicates consistent liberal positions while maintaining some moderate tendencies compared to Democratic colleagues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

245

total votes analyzed

Overview

Rick Larsen has represented Washington State in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat with a voting record that reflects progressive priorities. His voting patterns show strong support for defense-related measures, with an 88% approval rate in that category, alongside consistent engagement on healthcare and budget issues. Larsen's record demonstrates particular focus on healthcare legislation, where he has cast the most votes among his tracked categories. His approach to budget matters shows majority support (59% yea), while his agricultural votes similarly trend toward approval (60% yea). The sample votes from his early tenure (2001-2003) show a pattern of supporting bipartisan measures while opposing certain procedural motions, particularly 'ordering the previous question' votes which are typically party-line procedural tools. This suggests engagement with both substantive policy and procedural strategy in the House.

Key Positions

  • Strong supporter of defense legislation with 88% approval rate
  • Active engagement on healthcare policy with significant voting record
  • Majority support for agricultural measures
  • Consistent opposition to certain procedural motions that limit debate

By Policy Area

Healthcare134
49% yea51% nay
Budget & Spending39
59% yea41% nay
Agriculture35
60% yea40% nay
Other10
60% yea40% nay
Banking & Finance10
50% yea50% nay
Defense8
88% yea12% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $21.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$839K

42%

PAC / Committees$1.2M

58%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$721K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$119K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$154K · 19%
$200 – 499
$75K · 9%
$500 – 999
$146K · 18%
$1,000 – 1,999
$184K · 22%
$2,000+
$261K · 32%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (WA)$465K · 66%
Out-of-state$236K · 34%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

WA
$465K
CA
$53K
DC
$50K
TX
$32K
MD
$23K
FL
$13K
VA
$13K
AZ
$6K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$212K
SELF-EMPLOYED$23K
NULL$19K
MICROSOFT$9K
ACCELERATE STRATEGIES$9K
SEACAST INC.$8K
SEAN N. PARKER FOUNDATION$7K
SSC$7K
CEDAR GROVE$7K
SALTCHUK$7K
ARNOLD VENTURES$7K
CTC GLOBAL$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$953K
Administrative
$281K
Transfers
$140K
Contributions
$135K
Advertising
$26K
Materials
$18K
Fundraising
$10K
Travel
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$220K
2.

BROOKE DAVIS CONSULTING, INC.

$214K
3.

NEWMAN PARTNERS

$135K
4.

SEMIAHMOO RESORT

$117K
5.

MANDATE MEDIA

$100K
6.

PREMIER FIORELLO CONSULTING

$96K
7.

PERKINS COIE, LLP

$82K
8.

WASHINGTON STATE DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE

$79K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.3M

Operating Offsets

$42K

Net Operating

$1.3M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$1K

Committee Refunds

$4K

Coverage: 1/1/2025 7/15/2026FEC: H0WA02080Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Rick Larsen — U.S. Representative for Washington 2: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote