Voting Profile

Legislative Record

107 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 healthcare#2 environment energy#3 other#4 defense#5 social security

107

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.41Progressive

Senator Tina Smith positions herself on the progressive end of the Democratic Party, with a voting record slightly more liberal than the average Democrat in the Senate. Her NOMINATE score of -0.409 reflects consistent support for Democratic policy priorities across most issue areas.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

107

total votes analyzed

Overview

Tina Smith has served as a U.S. Senator from Minnesota since January 2018, when she was appointed to fill the seat vacated by Al Franken. Her voting record demonstrates strong alignment with Democratic Party positions on most major issues. Smith's legislative focus appears concentrated in healthcare, where she has cast the largest number of recorded votes. Her voting pattern in this area shows engagement with healthcare policy debates, though her 54% 'yea' rate suggests she has opposed certain healthcare-related measures that came to the floor. On defense and national security matters, Smith has shown unanimous support for the measures that reached a vote during the period covered. Her infrastructure and banking votes also show full support, though the sample size in these areas is limited. Her budget and agriculture votes show 0% 'yea' rates, indicating opposition to specific proposals in these areas during the time period analyzed. This may reflect disagreement with the particular legislation rather than opposition to these policy areas broadly.

Key Positions

  • Consistent opposition to certain judicial and executive nominations (multiple 'nay' votes on cloture and nomination votes)
  • Strong support for defense-related legislation (100% yea rate)
  • Active engagement on healthcare policy with mixed voting pattern
  • Opposition to specific budget proposals during this period
  • Support for infrastructure and banking measures that reached the floor

By Policy Area

Healthcare48
54% yea46% nay
Environment & Energy18
50% yea50% nay
Other16
50% yea50% nay
Defense8
100% yea0% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: January 9, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below. Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $28.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$2.5M

84%

PAC / Committees$492K

16%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.4M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$1.1M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$10K · 68%
$200 – 499
$0 · 0%
$500 – 999
$500 · 3%
$1,000 – 1,999
$1K · 7%
$2,000+
$3K · 22%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (MN)$6K · 52%
Out-of-state$6K · 48%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

MN
$6K
NY
$3K
DC
$1K
CA
$278
WI
$235
MD
$175
OH
$75
MS
$75

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

SELF$4K
NOT EMPLOYED$4K
ALBRIGHT STONEBRIDGE GROUP LLC$1K
NONE$536.5
EDINA REALTY, INC.$500
RETIRED$171
MAYO CLINIC$160
N/A$106
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIV$75
STATE OF MINNESOTA$70
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$65
ISD-11$50

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$386K
Refunds
$147K
Advertising
$33K
Fundraising
$7K
Contributions
$2K
Administrative
$535.68

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

GRASSROOTS SOLUTIONS

$68K
2.

CAMPAIGN COMPLIANCE LLC

$54K
3.

AUTHENTIC CAMPAIGNS

$52K
4.

PETERSEN GROUP

$51K
5.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$27K
6.

NGP VAN, INC.

$24K
7.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

$23K
8.

SCHIMANSKI & ASSOCIATES

$23K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$3.4M

Operating Offsets

$25K

Net Operating

$3.4M

Transfers

Transfers Out

$500

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$104K

Committee Refunds

$61K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$2.7M

Opposing

$911K

Total Outside Spending

$3.6M

Top Outside Spenders

01

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTA POLITICAL ACTION FUND

+$708K
$708K
02

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)

+$499K
$499K
03

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC

+$484K
$484K
04

ALLIANCE FOR A BETTER MINNESOTA FEDERAL PAC

+$425K
$425K
05

RIGHT NOW USA

-$295K
$295K
06

AMERICAS PAC

-$280K
$280K
07

VALOR AMERICA

-$190K
$190K
08

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$156K
$156K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2021 6/30/2026FEC: S8MN00578Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Tina Smith — U.S. Senator for Minnesota: Voting Record & Donors | PowerVote